Quantcast
Channel: Entertainment - Latest News, Photos And Videos
Viewing all 38214 articles
Browse latest View live

Loving Someone Far Away

$
0
0
2015-12-18-1450454536-1059557-TwinSistersYouTubeBanner20.jpg

Sure it hurts. But did you know that missing someone is actually a good sign?


"When you long for someone, it's not necessarily a sad thing," a psychologist told me. "It points to a good thing - proof that you have love in your life! You have to really care about someone in order to long for them."

Every day, millions of people all over the world think about someone they can't be with. Are you one of them?

Who do you miss, right now?

During the holiday season, we are supposed to connect with loved-ones, friends and family, but there are many people who can't.

I know two 12-year-old twin sisters who miss each other every day. It has been like this their whole life.
They share a very special story: As babies they were found abandoned in a cardboard box in a Chinese village, and adopted to two different corners of the world. One of them went to a tiny village in Norway, surrounded by high mountains and deep fjords. The other went to a big, busy city in the United States. Their sisterhood was meant to be kept a secret.

Destiny, however, had other plans...


This story became my documentary film Twin Sisters It's been seen by more than
20 million people, won several film awards and broadcasted on TV channels all over the world.

The film shows how distance can never truly separate two hearts that really care for one another.


Not a day goes by without the sisters thinking of each other. With Christmas coming up, they will celebrate the holiday in their own way despite of the thousands of miles between them.


They'll send each other gifts and cards, hoping that maybe next year they'll meet each other again. They know that when they meet, they'll pick up right where they left off, like no time has passed.

There are so many types of long-distance love.
It could be a spouse deployed to a distant war, a sibling who accepted a job in another country, a serious online romance, or a friend who is now a refugee.

Many people often dismiss long-distance love, believing that distance only weakens connections.
However, there is research that supports the contrary. People in long distance relationships report feeling emotionally closer to their loved ones. They are known to become better listeners and share more.

It's been said that in human relationships, distance is not measured in miles but in affection.
Whoever you are missing right now, the heartwarming story of Twin Sisters will give you hope and strength. It might even encourage you to reconnect with someone you have lost touch with (watch the film here)

It will make you laugh and cry, and look at life a little differently
. That's the feedback I've received from people who have watched the film so far. I believe this story is a gift, and hope it will continue to be spread and shared.

Together forever, never apart. Sometimes in distance, but never in heart.

Watch the film, click here

DVDs available on Amazon for all regions, click here

Follow the film on Facebook, click here
The film's website, click here


THE AWARD-WINNING FILM:


Twin Sisters from Mona Friis Bertheussen on Vimeo.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.












Jingles Bells Around the World

$
0
0
Christmas around the world is celebrated differently. Some countries celebrates close to American Christmas and some doesn't celebrate Christmas at all. Here is some fun facts you might not know about.


In south-Europe they celebrate Christmas quite different than European countries in the north. While families in north often have Christmas dinner at home evening December 24th, many of the southern Europeans are going out to the finest restaurants to celebrate.

Though Christmas is not a national holiday In Japan, Christmas parties are held around Christmas Day. Japanese Christmas cake, a white sponge cake covered with cream and decorated with strawberries, is often consumed. Christmas threes- and lights decorate cities and malls. Sometimes they also exchange gifts.

Christmas in Cuba was banned from 1969 to the late 1990s. Today it's a one-day public holiday.

Mele Kalikimaka can be translated from Hawaiian to mean Merry Christmas. Mele Kalikinaka is also a song recorded by Bing Crosby and The Andrews sisters

Christmas in the Philippines is one of the biggest and is broadly celebrated. The country has earned the attribute of celebrating the world's longest Christmas season, with Christmas carols heard as early as September 1th.

The Trafalgar Square Christmas tree in London has been an annual gift to the people of Britain by the city of Oslo each year since 1947, as a gesture of gratitude for British support of Norway during the Second World War.

2015-12-18-1450440522-3272269-Christmas_tree_in_Trafalgar_Square_cVisitBritain___Britain_on_View.jpg
The Trafalgar Square Christmas Tree. Photo: Visit Britain

Some Europeans eats Turkey as Christmas dinner, but many also eat local traditional food like ham, seafood and lamb. Stuffed Turkey is more popular as a course for New Year dinner than Christmas dinner.

The Scandinavian countries like to celebrate Walt Disney-Christmas. They listen to American Christmas-carols all December and on Christmas Eve, before dinner, people watch Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck on TV.

In France they like to eat snails and Foie gras at Christmas, and it's often served with red wine. Many also drink champagne during Christmas.

The official Christmas and holidays in Russia lasts from December 31 th to January 10th. Christmas is normally celebrated on January 7th. The date is different because the Russian Orthodox Church uses the old "Julian" calendar for religious celebration days.

In the Muslim world they don't celebrate Christmas, and many Muslims who lives in western countries request that their children not attend to Christmas functions at school. However, some Muslim countries have shopping malls where they use traditional western Christmas decoration.

India was a British Colony until 1947 and many traditions stayed including Christmas. Christmas is a state Holiday in India even when only approximately 2,3 percent of the population are Christians.

Boxing Day is a holiday traditionally celebrated by Great Britain and mostly by other former British colonies the day following Christmas Day, when servants and tradesmen would receive gifts. Known as a Christmas box, from their bosses or employers. Today, Boxing Day generally takes place on December 26.

In Brazil the Christmas Day on December 25th is a national holiday. Despite Brazil celebrates Christmas in the warm tropical summer weather in December, they as well have decorations with themes of winter and snow.

The Rockefeller Center Christmas Tree is placed annually in Rockefeller Center, in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. The Swarovski star, made by German artist Michael Hammers, has topped the tree since 2004. It's 9.5 feet in diameter and weighs 550 pounds.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Podcast Review: Victrola!

$
0
0
2015-12-18-1450472370-3839814-victrola.jpegAlready a great breeding ground for sketch comedy (Thrilling Adventure Hour, Superego, Lost Moon Radio) and improv (Spontaneanation, Improv4Humans, Illusionoid), podcasting continues to hold space for those audio theatrical companies who want to bring it.

A plucky little troupe from Austin's Coldtowne Theater rolled out eight episodes of Victrola! monthly starting in the spring, and they promise to return for a second season.

To whet your ears for what they do, they put out a compilation show this month, featuring some of their highlighted sketches from their first go-round. The show features seven sketches with titles like "The Trouble with Scrum," "Hobby Lobby After Dark," and "Suicide Squad The Motion Picture." A scratchy soundtrack with an old timey-sounding narrator opens the show and introduces the sketches, each of which moves pretty quickly -- they get a baker's half-dozen sketches delivered in about 31 minutes.

The group writes and acts in the sketch, some fine Austin sketch players like Michael Jastroch, Bob McNichol, Bryan Roberts, Lance Gilstrap, Cortnie Jones, and Jericho Thorp; along with some special guests.

2015-12-18-1450472440-9201-victrola_cast.jpg


Much in the vein of shows like Superego, the sketches are all improvised and then painstakingly edited into tight, cohesive pieces (which is why it takes a month to "cook" each installment.)

Clearly, by the delightful results, it's worth the wait...but here's hoping it doesn't take TOO long to get Season 2 kicked off.

• • •


Podcasts I'm also listening to this week: To The Manor Borne (By Robots) - Episode 1: Fronsty The Snowman; and Cashing In With T.J. Miller - Velveteen Pyramids, The Christmas Edition

• • •


The Victrola! review and other podcasts mentioned originally posted as part of This Week In Comedy Podcasts on Splitsider.com.

Marc Hershon is the host and executive producer of Succotash, The Comedy Podcast Podcast, featuring clips from comedy podcasts from across the Internet as well as interviews with podcasters, comedians, and assorted show biz folk.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Want To Be An Imagineer? Marty Sklar Shares Path In "One Little Spark"

$
0
0
Marty Sklar's fifty-plus year career at Disney included writing speeches for Walt Disney himself.  He's the ultimate insider knowing the ins and outs of the Disney theme parks and their attractions.  Sklar's second book, titled One Little Spark: Mickey's Ten Commandments and the Road to Imagineering, was published in September 2015, and in it he shares key lessons learned while designing some of Disney's most iconic attractions - as well as ones that didn't quite hit the mark.  [Would you believe he puts Disneyland's Haunted Mansion in the goof category?]  For those who dream of joining the attraction designer ranks, Sklar's book also answers the oft repeated question, "How do I become a Walt Disney Imagineer?"  Continue reading as Disney Imagineering Legend Marty Sklar shares the hits and misses of the Disney Parks as well as insight from the hidden hallways of his fellow Walt Disney Imagineers.

2015-12-18-1450450544-6324700-OneLittleSpark1000x1515.jpeg


Over 54 years, Marty Sklar progressed from Staff Writer to Vice President of Concepts and Planning, and ultimately President of Walt Disney Imagineering.  He was directly involved in the design of many key Disney Park attractions including: The Enchanted Tiki Room, it's a small world, Carousel of Progress, and Space Mountain to name a few.

2015-12-18-1450450804-5483607-7_09_DL_01387.jpg

Marty Sklar, Executive Vice President and Walt Disney Imagineering Ambassador holds his tribute window at Disneyland in Anaheim, CA, photo by Paul Hiffmeyer, © Disney Enterprises, Inc.


The title "One Little Spark: Mickey's Ten Commandments and the Road to Imagineering" comes from the Sherman Brothers song for the Journey Into Imagination attraction at Epcot, and Sklar chose the lyric as the title because he felt the song was the perfect anthem for Walt Disney Imagineering.

One Little Spark / Of Inspiration / Is at the heart / Of all creation



2015-12-18-1450451040-6495337-image_0029_1036.jpg

Figment, the playful purple dragon at Epcot's Imagination! Pavilion, photo courtesy Walt Disney World © Disney Enterprises, Inc.


The first half of One Little Spark goes through "Mickey's Ten Commandments" - principles Marty Sklar and the Imagineering team picked up after decades of creating Disney park experiences.  Rules such as create a wienie (i.e., visual magnet), avoid overload, and wear your guests' shoes.  For each of Mickey's Ten Commandments, Sklar shares a theme park attraction representing the BEST illustration of the principle.  For example, Commandment #5 is "Communicate with Visual Literacy" - making use of nonverbal tools to communicate a story such as color, shape, form, and texture.  Marty added, "there's no better example of visual storytelling than Epcot's World Showcase, and with a glance at the Mexico or France pavilions guests instantly know what they're seeing."

2015-12-18-1450451097-3357669-1101ZZ_5080GD.jpg

France Pavilion at Epcot's World Showcase, photo by Gene Duncan © Disney Enterprises, Inc.


However, Sklar doesn't just give a Pixie-dusted recount of Imagineering's successes.  For each of Mickey's Ten Commandments, Sklar also shares an attraction that fell short of reaching the principle - termed "The Goof."  Marty was open and honest that not everything Imagineering did worked, "if you're not failing, you're not trying anything new," he said.  In the case of Commandment #5 "Visual Literacy," Sklar says Disneyland's Haunted Mansion is a "Goof."  It's not that Sklar thinks the Haunted Mansion is a bad attraction, but the exterior does not tell the guest what's inside - it's not consistent with the story.  "This mansion does not look haunted from the outside," Sklar shares, "that is a contradiction, but that's the way Walt [Disney] wanted it."

2015-12-18-1450451151-3897500-HauntedMansion5_12_DL_9074.jpg

Disneyland's Haunted Mansion, photo by Scott Brinegar © Disney Enterprises, Inc.


Sklar continues throughout the book to share examples of Imagineering Goofs such as Disney's Animal Kingdom's original, confusing entrance, as well as wins - Disney's Castles, the most ideal wienie (visual magnet) ever created.  Spoiler alert, Shanghai Disneyland's Enchanted Storybook Castle will be the largest and most elaborate Disney castle yet created when it opens in 2016.

2015-12-18-1450451219-9704444-ShanghaiDisneyCeremony5.jpg

Shanghai Disney Resort Groundbreaking Ceremony, photo by David Roark © Disney Enterprises, Inc.


The second half of One Little Spark discusses "The Road to Imagineering" and what it takes to become a Walt Disney Imagineer.  For this section Marty not only offers his own advice, but the wisdom from many current, former, and legendary Imagineers.  It was important to get his colleagues' perspective because, "this book is how Imagineering does things," Sklar said, "not how I do things."

2015-12-18-1450451322-3302642-DSC08374.jpg

Marty Sklar (center) leads panel discussion of Walt Disney Imagineers at Disney's D23 Expo, photo by Dave Parfitt


Marty asked his fellow Imagineers to share their path to Imagineering, and he received messages from 75 Imagineers as far away as Paris and Shanghai - offering to help guide future careers.  Sklar boiled their advice into categories such as: story, collaboration, and curiosity.  However, there was one principle that stood out as most important to becoming an Imagineer.  "Passion," Sklar replied, "love what you do, develop a passion for it, find what turns you on the most, and become the best at it."

2015-12-18-1450451355-3591185-MartySklarbookcrop.jpg

Marty Sklar © Disney Enterprises, Inc.


Coming from the only Disney employee who participated in the opening of each of the current 11 Disney Theme Parks worldwide, that's pretty good advice not just to become an Imagineer, but for life in general.  Marty Sklar's One Little Spark: Mickey's Ten Commandments and the Road to Imagineering, makes a great gift for any Disney fan.  Young people who aspire to create the rides, shows, and attractions of Disney's Magical Kingdoms will especially enjoy the book.  One Little Spark! is available now in hardback with 288 pages for $25.00.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Darth Vader: Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love The Dark Side

$
0
0
2015-12-18-1450447345-7810839-DarthVader.jpg

To date, I have not yet Force-choked someone with my mind, lobbed an active (or inactive, for that matter) lightsaber at anyone, nor fired blue bolts of lightning from my fingers.

Even if I have thought about it plenty of times.

Although I've not yet assumed the Darth prefix - Darth Sagers does kind of work - I often feel the Dark Side of the Force flowing through me. (This may be unrelated but I am also a Scorpio born in the Year of the Snake. And I wear a lot of black. I think I'd likely also be placed in House Slytherin.)

But I'm not evil.

Instead, the darkness inside of me is something of a guide, a force, if you will, that I must contend with.

Let me back up. How have I ended up on this path, and are more people close to the Dark Side than they'd like to admit? I have been thinking about this a lot recently since Hasbro invited me to either #ChooseLightSide or #ChooseDarkSide in their Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens promotion. Without hesitating, I selected #ChooseDarkSide.

Frankly I was surprised by how many of my colleagues picked #ChooseLightSide. When I brought up the fact at a New York Comic Con party that the Dark Side is clearly cooler, a work friend replied, "Yeah, but we're the good guys, and we win. And your side is evil."

That is a difficult argument to counter, because it's true.

At least, in Star Wars, the good guys do win eventually. And I don't desire the alternative. I have never wished for Vader to kill Luke and return to the Emperor's side, nor did I want Luke to take out his pop and become Palpatine's lapdog. Although I don't often prefer neatly-wrapped conclusions where heroes vanquish evil too easily, I typically crave the happy (or happier) ending.

Yet all the Star Wars action figures on my desk villains (lots of Darth Vaders, three Boba Fetts, a few Mauls, a Kylo Ren). But most telling is the fact that the lone "hero" on my desk is a "Hero Mashers" Darth Luke decked out with a Vader cape and boots, red lightsaber, and blue, plastic Force lightning hands. In a way, the darkness on my desk represent my transformation from relating to the hero to the bad guys.

When I was much younger, I desperately wanted to be Luke Skywalker. I got him. A country boy who learns he is special, and has to save the universe. He was whiny but ultimately good, guided by certainty and a sense of purpose. He was a white hat out to take down the black hats, and that path most closely aligned with my own binary moral code. Hell, I grew up in suburbia Orlando, a Catholic who believed in Santa Claus; things often came down to nice or naughty definitions, and I wanted to be the nice guy hero. With Jedi powers, ideally.

Then I became a teenager, and the naughty captured more of my attention. I wasn't necessarily seduced by the Dark Side - yet -- but I went from wanting to be Luke to wishing that I was at least half as cool as Han Solo. The swagger, the devil-may-care attitude, the ability to be cool and attract women without acting like he was trying to attract women.

The transition from Luke to Han is one a lot of people can relate to, but did they also feel the call of the Dark Side? I should think so, and think most people actually do. Like encountering a phantom in a creepy cave on Dagobah, the darkness pops out when you don't expect it - when you unleash a well-timed ugly word to a loved one, for instance, and feel a surge of power followed immediately by a wave of regret. But, like Luke, that darkness already existed within and we just brought it into that cave (or argument, etc) where we were vulnerable. This is something Obi-Wan or Yoda understood.

The path to being good is more than simply deciding to Choose Light Side, and then it's done. Luke's struggle is never ending, with the pull to the Dark Side always present. One doesn't just give in and saber down a room full of younglings and become a full-on Sith (although that will do the trick). Instead, the little things are constantly tugging at some of us: curse the tourists walking three abreast on the sidewalk, freak out at the rampant farter in the seat next to you on the airplane, spoil The Force Awakens to the movie theater talker...strike them down, use your aggressive feelings, let the hate flow through you.

Good, gooood ... Sorry, got out of hand for a second there.

Yes, the power of the Dark Side is strong with me. And I do not want to deny that. What I don't think old Ben and Yoda adequately passed along to their star pupil (the one that didn't end up with a tape deck on his chest) is that it's necessary to embrace that darkness to some degree. By the end of Episode VI, Luke is a full-on Jedi, and we're led to believe he'll no longer run the risk of breaking bad like dad did.

Neglecting the presence of the villain within makes it easier to be seduced by it, and fall prey to its influence. Instead of boiling it down to Dark or Light Side, I think there's a lot of grey in the Force. And while there are some Lukes and Vaders out there amongst us, most of us might fall in the slightly tarnished middle part of the spectrum. The potential to slide either way is never over, either. I have done a lot of good, and enough bad, that I could still end up a hero or villain in this world - or at least an okay dude or an asshat, to put it in less extreme terms

Understanding that we have a Mr. Hyde inside us allows us, or me, to work with him, process his desires, and tamp down the ones that are destructive. Rather than ignoring my inner villain, I embrace him as a means of keeping him in check. In order to take control of the inner conflict, I feel I must use my aggressive feelings and filter them out in the right way. Playing Halo helps.

And all those black-clad Sith Lords and baddies on my desk stand there not just because they have the coolest fashion sense, but as totems of what not to become. I want to be a good guy, but that requires being in touch with - but not giving into - the Dark Side inside.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Mother Nature: Female Hip Hop Duo Empowered to Bring Social Change

$
0
0
Maya Angelou once said, "I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass." And like the quote, women within in communities across the United States are assuming bold stances and using their voices and talents to become key players in movements pushing for change.

Hip Hop duo, Mother Nature, out of Champaign, Illinois, comprised of two dynamic female emcees, T.R.U.T.H. and Klevah, are some of those women making waves as both young activists and powerful hip hop emcees.

2015-12-18-1450458036-5105711-MotherNature.jpg
Photo By @twobrainz
T.R.U.T.H. (left) and Klevah (right) of Mother Nature. DJ Leg Two as support.

T.R.U.T.H is originally from the Austin neighborhood on Chicago's Westside and said writing preceded emceeing. She was an introvert as a child and sought writing as a way to get her feelings out. T.R.U.T.H later found emceeing as a fit for her creative expressions. She is inspired by Chicago hip hop artist Chance The Rapper and singer Michael Jackson--a fan of Jackson because of his ability to be himself and speak on social issues. Her Eve EP was released in February of 2015.

Klevah, is a native of Champaign and feels at home on the mic. Her father is an emcee and helped develop her craft in her early years. She recalls being exposed to artists such as Public Enemy, Tribe Called Quest, Erykah Badu, and other conscious artists. Her father helped her hone her craft, but her voice as an emcee came as she experienced life. Her album GLDN EP was released in November 2015.

Now joining forces, both artists were inspired by Dr. Ruth Nicole Brown's Gender and Women's Studies courses at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Dr. Ruth Nicole Brown is an Associate Professor in the Gender and Women's Studies and taught Klevah and T.R.U.T.H in various courses at the University.

"I never realized I could do everything I want to do in life through hip hop," Klevah said while also attributing Dr. Ruth Nicole Brown's guidance in realizing they could fuse hip hop with academics and other aspirations. In addition to inspiring the duo, Dr. Ruth Nicole Brown inspires other black girls through her organization Saving Our Lives, Hear Our Truths (SOLHOT), "a practice based, publicly engaged, collectively organized space for Black girls to envision Black girlhood anew."

Mother Nature aspires to "teach people to be solid within themselves," as Klevah put it. She added that people are looking for affirmation often times--a voice to tell them that the way they are feeling is understood and shared. The duo expresses yearn to specifically target the minds of younger people while also reaching them in a way that they can still find hip and enjoyable.

"I like to connect to the youth. Any movement is youth-based at the end of the day. Youth are on the ground level," T.R.U.T.H. explained.

Besides making tracks like "Afro", a track they hope young black women will listen to and feel empowered, T.R.U.T.H and Klevah of Mother Nature are involved in the Black Lives Matter movement.

"The music influenced the choice," Klevah explained as to what inspired them to become part of the movement. They attended a Black Lives Matter convening in Cleveland, Ohio earlier in 2015 to teach a workshop, which further empowered Mother Nature to aspire to teach more and understand their responsibility as both emcees and people of color.

After returning from Cleveland, Ohio, the two worked with others to set up a Black Lives Matter chapter in Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, which is still in its beginning stages.

And inspired by recent police brutality incidents, T.R.U.T.H. is in the process of making a mix tape entitled, Millennial Protest Music. A song entitled, "Stop Killing My People," is one the tracks to be on the mixtape due to come out some time in January.

They agree that sometimes being a woman can make people doubt their abilities as an emcee but added that they see being a woman as a strength that gives them the ability to be "100 percent themselves."

"Women have a lot of power and the power to influence," Klevah said.

Mother Nature is expected to release their debut album sometime in Spring of 2016. Their music can be found on Bandcamp.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











#inthegridmusic: 12.17.15

$
0
0
2015-12-18-1450407384-7706372-maxresdefault.jpg | @GritzGMG


Hi all! Before you read on, I want to remind you that my Twitter username and Instagram name have changed! Good thing is that they are both the same so they won't be hard to forget - @byingridvasquez

Now ...

12.16.15 #SongBlogIV (my song of the day): "Ooh Ahh (My Life Be Like)" by GRITZ ft. tobyMac



"Ooh Ahh" is sung by Christian hip hop group GRITS and is on their fourth album, "The Art of Translation." The song has been featured on MTV's My Super Sweet Sixteen. The Buried Life, So You Think You Can Dance, Fast and The Furious: Tokyo Drift and Big Momma's House 2. Because the song is a famous TV song, here is a collection of some other classic TV songs:




The Music Minute:

- 2016 Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Inductees announced: http://www.wtae.com/entertainment/rock-and-roll-hall-of-fame-announces-2016-inductees/370089
- JAYZ sued by label artist Rita Ora: http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/music/rita-ora-files-lawsuit-jay-z-record-label-article-1.2469797
- Sia releases song originally for Rihanna: http://www.thefader.com/2015/12/17/sia-cheap-thrills
- LL Cool J will host the Grammys once more: http://www.ew.com/article/2015/12/16/ll-cool-j-hosting-2016-grammys?xid=socialflow_twitter_peoplemag

Make sure to follow me on twitter & Instagram: @byingridvasquez to get my #SongBlogIV every day of the week (Monday - Sun) (I write about a lot of things so you won't be bored) and invite your friends to read #inthegridmusic exclusively on the Huffington Post.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Star Wars: The Force Awakens: The Greatest Review Ever

$
0
0
Star Wars: The Force Awakens is the greatest motion picture in the history of cinéma -- that's fairly obvious -- but it's also humanity's only hope for salvation, as a people, as a species, as life forms adrift in a savage and utterly inconvenient field of reality.

Indeed, the Force may have been taking a little nap (apparently the energy field that binds the universe together hit 'Snooze' for 32 1/2 years), but now it's back, and it's a hit, it's a classic, it's the answer to all our prayers -- even the prayers of people who don't pray. It's that good. It's so good, it makes me want to dust off the very finest critic terms, such as "bravura" and "painterly" and "tour de force." I've gotten so excited typing these first few lines that I had to take a shower and go for a little walk. But I'm back -- and as noted so is Star Wars: bigger, better, faster, stronger, oh, heck: The Force Awakens is no mere "movie" -- it's the single greatest work of art produced since the discovery of fire (if perhaps it's tied with Talking Heads' Remain in Light, but who's keeping score?)

Don't worry about spoilers here, because whether or not Han Solo (Harrison Ford) is killed by his son Kylo Ren (Adam Driver), I'm not telling! Instead, let it be enough to state that this shimmering and scintillating tale encompasses all it means to be human -- and, uh, also sometimes not human (as old white guys who played weird creatures with silly names long, long ago briefly punch the clock). For instance, in encompassing everything there is to know and experience about existence, in this Star Wars movie there are people running, and also there are people shouting, sometimes simultaneously! Vehicles fly around and shoot at each other and stuff. Some of the people in it are mean, whereas others are nice, and still some others are kind of in between -- just like in real life! It's. That. Good.

Also there's a desert planet that isn't Tatooine; and a snowy planet that isn't Hoth (which George Lucas, unless he was being ironic, really should have called "Coldth"). Intriguing!

2015-12-18-1450402866-4090602-LupitabyGregory.jpg

At the Hollywood première, lovely Lupita Nyong'o kindly signs
autographs for eBay hounds (and a fan or two)


That said, one of the most important aspects of Star Wars: The Force Awakens is its revolutionary feminism. Read it here, aloud, in front of your coworkers: there are people in this Star Wars movie who are not men, but also who are not Princess Leia! In fact, even Princess Leia isn't Princess Leia anymore, as here she's General Leia, and of course she's Carrie Fisher, and I mean, come on: novelist! Love her. (And since the Baby Boomer generation is nothing without its relentless nepotism, Fisher's millennial daughter Billie Lourd also gets to participate -- and acquits herself admirably, this writer hastens to add.)

Speaking of feminism, just as Luke Skywalker (don't hold your breath) was a boy-man, there's a new girl-woman character here who's kind of Katniss Everdeen and Imperator Furiosa and Lara Croft except not exactly, cryptically called Rey (Daisy Ridley), and frankly she kicks a lot of ass (or, in Ridley's native parlance, arse). If the galaxy itself were an ass -- and we're probably lucky it isn't -- it would have Rey's desert-scavenger boot print displayed prominently on its galactic glutes. Frankly, as brunette British sci-fi women go, Daisy Ridley cannot repair the tragedy of Jenna Louise Coleman quitting Doctor Who, but there's (new) hope that perhaps she can help fill that considerable void. There's also some other TV show's Gwendoline Christie playing sort of a typical blonde, as well as wondrous Oscar-winner Lupita Nyong'o completely obscured as this kind of CG ancient gypsy pirate female-Yoda action-figure person. Combined, these female characters literally eradicate sexism. That's right! Go open the door, step outside, and sniff the air: all sexism around the entire planet is gone! With just one movie out of the gate, Disney's Star Wars has totally obliterated sexism. Plus disease, famine, pollution, war, racist cops, gluten, airline delays, and pro football have also been wiped away by The Force Awakens. It's. That. Good.

2015-12-18-1450403161-617897-GwendolinebyGregory.jpg

Gorgeous Gwendoline Christie cheerfully enters
a mildly wretched hive of scum and villainy


And yes, there are also some guys in this Star Wars movie. Simon Pegg is kind of in it, just as he's kind of in every movie. (Is Simon Pegg the new Gene Hackman?) That "Ming the Merciless" guy from that old sci-fi serial where Star Wars pilfered its opening crawl (and plenty of other stuff) is in it for a few seconds, too. That bloke from Attack the Block is also in it, and he's pretty good! The makers have carefully delivered a proper Benetton-ad spread of a cast -- albeit puzzlingly without a whole lot of Asians -- but there is a solid Honduran guy. No Christopher Lee, though, sadly (I actually love Attack of the Clones; and I'm single -- connection?)

In closing, this handy paragraph is dedicated to exclamatory phrases. Star Wars: The Force Awakens is mind-blowingly brilliant! It's astounding! Jaw-droppingly thrilling! The greatest of them all! I laughed, I cried, I screamed and broke five chairs, I got arrested! If you see one movie this year that probably won't win Best Picture (but you never know), make it this one! Flashy! Neato! Fabulous! Dazzling! Triumphant! Grand, sweeping, deeply satisfying storytelling for the new millennium! The best thing that's ever happened to me in my entire life except for that thing I can't print here! Wild! Grandiose! Sick! ("Sick"??) Um, um...oh: MAGNIFICENT! (That's always a good one. Publicists: Go with that one.) And that should just about do it. For you see, I haven't actually viewed Star Wars: The Force Awakens yet -- I'm just hoping like everybody else that I can land a quote on the home video packaging, or at least in a newspaper ad (if there are still newspapers). Thank you, Star Wars. You have definitely changed my life. Now excuse me, for I need a good laugh, thus I'm off to go see Sisters -- which still has a few tickets available.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.












Days of Our Lives' Turns 50: Giving Respect to The Soap Star

$
0
0
2015-11-11-1447212326-2048302-UiH3Exko.jpg
(Actor Eric Martsolf (Eric Brady). Martsolf won a Daytime Emmy for this role. Photographer: Brad Everett Young)


This past November, another milestone happened in the entertainment world. Days of Our Lives officially marked its 50th year on air. The NBC soap premiered on November 8, 1965. Throughout the years, it entertained millions as they watched the trials and tribulations of the residents of Salem. All the families from the Horton's to the DiMera's have seen their fair share of drama and betrayal. Yes, at times the storylines were out there, but this was the allure that helps attract audiences, both new and old, on a daily basis.

2015-11-11-1447206952-7171461-BillyChairCFBedit.jpg
(Actor Billy Flynn (Chad DiMera). Photographer: Brad Everett Young)


For many actors being on a soap opera is a launching point. In fact, many well-known actors and actresses first appeared in this genre before moving on to bigger things. The list is actually pretty lengthy, so I suggest looking it up later. Still, any actor who appeared on a soap for any length of time will tell you one thing: Being on a soap opera is hard work.

While many prime-time shows tape a certain amount of episodes and only part of the year, soap operas' premiere a new episode almost every single, Monday thru Friday. There are a few times a year that a new episode does not air during the typical work week. This tends to be due to sporting events, major news events or some holidays. However, this is still hundreds of episodes a year, a feat that only talk shows and news broadcasts can match. During this time the actors must memorize in some cases 40 pages of dialogue or more a day and the cast and crew work very long hours as they maintain a budget while still pumping out new episodes and creating new storylines that they hope the fans will enjoy.

2015-11-11-1447206888-377546-SpencerMollyCheersAFBedit.jpg
(Actor Spencer Neville (Derrick) and Actress Molly Burnett (Melanie Jonas). Photographer: Brad Everett Young)


I first dipped my toe into the soap world, a few years ago. After clicking around on YouTube one day, I came across a storyline about two characters named Will Horton and Sonny Kiriakis known to fans as "WilSon." After watching a clip, I was a little intrigued and to my surprise, I found many of the clips in-order of this storyline posted on a few fan channels. The storyline was fairly new so I was able to binge-watch the clips in a day or so. Later I wrote about the storyline and also wrote about the mere fact that I never watched a soap before, (You can read it here) I hit submit and went on with my day.

2015-11-11-1447214886-2577930-BG94X9oP.jpg
(Actress Mary Beth Evans (Kayla Brady). Photographer: Brad Everett Young)


To my surprise, after it got published, a tidal wave of support flooded in. People were ecstatic, which at the time, this novice fan was confused and little overwhelmed. However, it became abundantly clear: Soap opera fans, (whichever one or ones they watch) are passionate. Like boy band/pop star passionate. They have watched their soaps in some cases decades. They have followed their favorite storyline, characters, and have gone-through the head-aches and heartbreaks along with the characters. They travel to fan events all over the country and sometimes internationally to meet their favorite stars in-person. They are vocal when they love something on the show and vocal when they hate something (even more so with social media). Overall many have formed a community (a "fandom" one could say) that resulted in friendships with each other and members of the cast.

2015-11-11-1447206918-872587-RobAnnivCheersAFBedit.jpg
(Actor Rob Wilson (Ben Weston). Photographer: Brad Everett Young)


As someone who has observed the soap world, it is time both the entertainment industry and the public give a little more respect to soap stars. I won't say they demand respect (I can't and won't speak for them), but I have observed that some members of either the entertainment world or the general public look down upon these hard working individuals. Why? I am not sure. It could be due to the outrageous storylines (yet some prime-time storylines can be even more out there) or even the time these shows are on. It could also appear to an outsider as easier work compared to other forms of entertainment, but in this case, appearances are deceiving. Regardless of the reason, it is important to remember that like many in the entertainment industry, these actors and actresses work hard to produce a product for the public to enjoy. While some will go on to bigger opportunities, others will not and that's okay. So congrats to Days of Our Lives on hitting this milestone. While it shouldn't take a milestone (like the 50th Anniversary) to realize how hard you all work, it is a perfect time to be reminded.

2015-11-11-1447215314-3176307-JenPatsyBack2BackFBedit1.jpg
(Actress Jen Lilley (Theresa Donovan) and Actress Patsy Pease (Kimberly Brady). Photographer Brad Everett Young)

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Going Back to a Galaxy Far, Far Away

$
0
0
I was six years old when I went to see Star Wars with my father and my older siblings. My mother didn't join us. I think she was taking care of my younger sister who had been born that year and even at my young age, I kind of sensed that my father had been tasked with "getting us out of the house."

Going to see Star Wars was a good idea and we quickly became a Star Wars family. My parents bought the John Williams soundtrack - on a double LP in a sleeve that had stills from the film - and I would listen to it all the time, looking at the pictures and dreaming of getting off Tatooine with Luke and Leia. We had all the action figures as well. Action figures that would one day be worth way more than we ever could have imagined. We had the playsets - the Death Star, the X-Wing fighter whose wings would spring open with the touch of a button. And costumes. My brothers dressed up as Han and Luke. They made light sabers from paper towel tubes. And then we got the real ones. Plastic, light up sabers that bent within hours of getting them.

It seems like it really was a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. At least far from where I am now. I was six years old. I think of that now when I hear worried mothers fretting over taking their 9 year olds to the new film. Sometimes I wonder what my parents were even thinking. But my memories of Star Wars and the subsequent films are very different than those of my kids. For starters, we thought those graphics were awesome! Back when I was educating them in the ways of the force, I warned them about the scary parts. Sat near them in case they freaked out. Like that scene in Empire Strikes Back when Luke wanders into a cave on Dagobah and faces Darth Vader. That scared the crap out of me when I was a kid. My son, watching the same scene, looked over at me and laughed. "Yeah mom. REALLY scary."

2015-12-18-1450417651-5524791-starw.jpg

With this new episode coming out, the stakes are high. I'm not just talking about the franchise here. When the first three episodes came out, there wasn't as much at stake. It was backstory. My childhood characters were safe back in the 70s and I could line up with the rest of the world and criticize the prequels as not being real. Not part of the "real" movies.

But now, the original cast is back and I'm a little concerned. I remember what it was like when Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull came out and I had to reconcile an older, grayer, and significantly slower Indy. Chewbacca and the droids might not have aged, but the Princess and Han are definitely not where I left them 36 years ago. And even though I haven't seen Luke in the trailers, I know he's there. Older. Wiser. Darker, maybe. I'm thinking Darth Vader darker.

As worried as I am, I still have my tickets ready. I'm where my parents were 36 years ago and I'm taking my kids to watch their first Star Wars movie in a theater. While I'm going back 30 some-odd years, they're just getting launched. I have high hopes, though. Because even though I've aged with the characters, in some ways, I think it will be more like what Han says in the trailer. It will be like coming home.

With better graphics.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Satire and Redemption: Reading Spike Lee's Chi-Raq

$
0
0
It is never easy to articulate an initial response to a Spike Lee film. His films are not conducive to the formulaic "Did you like it or not?" question. A Spike Lee "joint" can be overwhelming, frustrating, hilarious, trenchant, unfinished, and haunting.

In opposition to most of the films produced by the Hollywood machine, Lee's works leave fans and detractors with lingering tensions and frictions - and occasionally a glaring silence. I experienced this last fall when I taught Lee's early works in my race and film class.

After teaching Do the Right Thing (1989) during the second week of class (and juxtaposing the police choke hold, and killing, of the character Radio Raheem with the image of Eric Garner being choked to death by officers), I was disappointed by my inability to spark a vibrant conversation about the film. Students seemed uninterested and unmoved. Later in the course, as students began to get more comfortable, they confessed that a film like Do the Right Thing was "too much" to handle. The scenes, dialogues, themes, and format of the film incited a kind of discomfort, a protracted moment of silence that reminds us that certain experiences cannot immediately find the words for normal expression.

Lee's new film, Chi-Raq, might not be "likable" but it definitely follows his previous films as it prompts viewers to think critically about unresolved tensions and problems in the film and the broader social world. Inspired by Aristophanes' play Lysistrata and taking the form of a musical satire, Chi-Raq centers around a group of women who refrain from having sex with their boyfriends as an incentive to end the cyclical gang violence.

Through satire, the film plays on racial and gender stereotypes while drawing attention to America's internal wars, the all too familiar deaths and losses experienced in cities like Chicago. There is much in the film that both fascinates and disappoints; I am particularly interested in three aspects that pertain to the film and its critics: the complexity of representation, the use of the term Chi-Raq, and the theme of salvation in the film.

One criticism that has been directed toward the film, especially by Chicago natives, is that it is exploitative; it turns the complicated, and serious, realities of Chicago into a satire and musical. Some have even questioned Lee's authority to speak about the city - he is an outsider and does not have intimate knowledge of the city's problems. What is interesting is how the concern about the inappropriateness of satire resembles Lee's dismissal of Quentin Tarantino's 2012 film, Django Unchained.

In one interview, Lee revealed that he would not see Django because it would be disrespectful to his ancestors. He suggested that part of the disrespect lies in Tarantino's decision to turn slavery into a spaghetti western. In other words, Lee suggests that the western cannot properly represent the horrors of slavery in the same way that critics of Chi-Raq claim that a musical, or Greek comedy, fails to capture Chicago's present circumstances. This brings up important questions about representation and genre that we should be talking about. What would a proper cinematic depiction of Chicago look like? Is the supposed disconnect between the musical genre, or Greek comedy, and the "reality" of violence part of the film's satire and parody? Does the gap between genre and content get at the complexities of the present moment? Who gets to represent a community and what counts as a proper, or improper, depiction?

Another source of contention is the use of term "Chi-Raq." In a provocative article recently written by Mychal Denzel Smith in The Nation, the author accuses Lee of uncritically adopting this term from Chicago rappers, a term that naturalizes violence in Iraq and denies America's involvement in creating that violence. Smith rightly points out that the beginning of the film compares the numbers of American soldiers who have died in Iraq and Afghanistan to deaths in Chicago without mentioning deaths of Iraqis or Afghans. While I agree with much of Smith's analysis, he leaves out some things.

For one, there is a long legacy (beyond Chief Keef ) in hip hop culture of invoking Middle Eastern places as signifiers of violence and zones of war. Think for instance of Capone and Noreaga's 1997 album War Report where Lefrak City, Queens is referred to as Iraq. When hip hop artists make these connections and analogies, they don't simply naturalize war in the Middle East. They also show the continuities between violence elsewhere and violence at home, a tactic that troubles notions of American exceptionalism and that links local and global expressions of violence and suffering. Lee's Chi-Raq gestures toward these connections in the beginning of the film as we are shown an image of America composed of guns pointing in all directions. Guns are pointing beyond the borders of the U.S. suggesting that the production and consumption of weapons in this country has global effects. And the fact that the women in the film, led by Lysistrata (played by Teyonah Parris), take over an armory shows that any understanding of "war" in Chicago would have to include a re-evaluation of militarism and empire.

The final aspect of the film that stands out is the theme of salvation. Recall that Spike Lee has said that he expects the film to save lives in Chicago. Throughout the film, there is a persistent concern about saving the lives of children, protecting them from the senseless bloodshed. The church plays a significant role in the film as Father Mike Corrigan (played by John Cusack and inspired by Father Michael Pfleger) gives a powerful sermon during a funeral that connects gun violence to poverty and inequality. Yet one of the most memorable scenes that pertains to salvation is the final one. Chi-raq (played by Nick Cannon) is escorted by police officers in handcuffs down a gauntlet of community mothers. He has just confessed to killing a young girl by accident.

After Chi-raq reminds the crowd that he is not the only murderer present, the viewer gets a sense that the film is playing on the scapegoat metaphor. Perhaps this scene is part of the satire, a critique of our tendency to direct blame toward individuals and shield ourselves from the problems and tensions that we share. If we can just get rid of the Chi-Raqs (communities and individuals), we will be rescued from the violence that plagues our social world. We will be cleansed of the dirt and blood that the social order produces. On my reading, this kind of convenient fantasy is what the film exposes and challenges through parody and satire.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Star Wars: Recycled but Great

$
0
0
Star Wars: The Force Awakens, produced by Lucasfilm and Abrams' BadRobot Productions felt familiar like an old friend, but one that had done some introspective work and has grown up a bit since we last met. Parents should note that it fully earns its PG-13 rating, based on violence alone.  No sex, no nudity, no foul language. We do see blood a few times and there is plenty of death, some up close and personal.  The violence is not gratuitous, at least, and the close-up killings are the bloodless, light-saber type for the most part. However, like the first movie (i.e. Episode IV in 1977), a beloved character does die, so there is some emotional violence that was the hardest part for my eight year old.  

A tragic death is only one of many similarities with the original Star Wars; it appears that the creators took all the best elements and modernized them just a bit for this version. There is a strong female lead who makes the original Princess Leia (who was a feminist, silver-screen trailblazer in the 70's) look like a wuss -- an indication of our times and the recent trend of movies that feature aggressive and independent young women.  There is the reluctant hero (as Han Solo was in the first movie), but this time the hero is played by an African American character who is not swaggering like Han, but otherwise just as handsome and instantly lovable. I enjoyed watching his transformation from self-centered to selfless just as much. There is also the wonderful sexual tension between these two leads, without the third-wheel (e.g., Luke, in the first movie), or at least one who lets the dynamic of the two take center-stage. There is no Luke-type character, unless you count the top fighter pilot. There's also just one, cute robot, BB-8. There is also a tragic father-son drama, the mega-weapon in the hands of the bad guys that has a singular weak spot that must be blasted to bits by x-wing fighters, and of course the push-pull of the two sides of the force.

As many know from her hilarious interview with Good Morning America or other press, we are treated to an older, now General Leia played by Carrie Fisher in The Force Awakens, and there are other, wonderful treats for fans of the original, most beloved movie. Suffice it to say that the theater erupted into applause several times during the screening I saw.

Overall, I forgave the recycling of themes, characters, and other elements, since they they were so beloved, modernized, and with stunning special effects. Given all of the amazing movies that have been produced since Star Wars Episode IV blew our minds using plastic models, I knew that I wouldn't be as amazed this time, but the movie is beautifully shot and every computer element feels as real as you would expect. I doubt I will see it in the theater 7 times as I did the first movie in 1977, but of course now we have digital streaming into our living rooms. I will certainly be seeing it again, and not just because my son insists on it.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Trying to Get Excited for Star Wars

$
0
0
OK.

I'm probably gonna get my you-know-what's cut off with a light saber for writing this, but I guess I'll take the plunge.

I am excited for Star Wars, but I can't get myself to be as excited as I feel I should be.

Don't get me wrong. (Have you noticed that whenever anybody writes 'Don't get me wrong', what they really mean is 'please don't beat the crap out of me for what I'm about to say?')

So, as I was saying...don't get me wrong.

I love Star Wars. I love Hans Solo and Chewy and that crazy chess game (I think it's called Dejarik) and Darth Vader's seeming emphysema and Luke's innocence and Obi-Wan's wisdom and the bickering-like-an-old-couple ramblings of C-3PO and R2D2.

I love that Yoda talks like most of the old men I met at the synagogue when I was growing up.

But c'mon, people. Can we just admit that Star Wars is mostly a pretty good Western? And again, don't get me wrong...I love a pretty good Western.

But you know what I really love?

A great Western.

And that would be any Western that taunts us with nuance.

Is Walter Huston in The Treasure of the Sierra Madre good, bad, or indifferent? Is he driven by the same greed as he compatriots or is he driven by a kind of voyeuristic and perhaps even addictive desire to watch the folly of men? Is Gary Cooper in High Noon 100% correct in going back? After all, he's sworn off violence. He's just married a Quaker. And still, what's he say? What's that great line?

"I have to go," he tells his wife. "That's the whole thing."

The "whole thing" could mean about a zillion different things, and that's the fun and anxiety that a great Western engenders. (And it isn't lost on me that the trailer in High Noon has words going by on the screen just like at the beginning of Star Wars...)

So, go enjoy Star Wars. Enjoy the good guys and the bad guys. Groan like Chewy. Swing your light saber with abandon. Revel in The Force.

I'm gonna do all that, and I'll probably see this new movie more than once.

But be careful not read too much into the story. Star Wars is fun precisely because it lacks subtlety. That' not a problem, of course, unless you think what you're watching is profound when it's not.

I know, I know. It is pretty cool when Yoda says, "Do or do not. There is no try." But that's not a particularly intense or mystical revelation. That's what you say to yourself when you have to finish exercising.

It doesn't hold a candle to Gary Cooper referring to "the whole thing."

Look. I'm all for non-profound fun. I just can't imagine making more of Star Wars than it already is. It's more than enough to talk about good guys and bad guys. That's an age-old story line and we should just kick back and enjoy.

May the force be with all of you. There will be time for subtlety in other films.


Steve Schlozman is the author of The Zombie Autopsies, Smoke Above Treeline, and a number of short stories. He practices child psychiatry at Harvard Medical School.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Am I the Only Lesbian Who Didn't Love 'Carol?'

$
0
0
Like many other women-loving-women, I was incredibly excited at the prospects of the movie Carol. I mean, how often is an amazingly talented (not to mention sizzling sexy) star like Cate Blanchett and a big Hollywood production budget dedicated to a lesbian-themed film? Especially a film where the girl gets the girl (spoiler, sorry) and especially one that's beautifully crafted.

No one can deny the importance of movies like Go Fish in the oeuvre of lesbian representation in media. Who among us didn't run to the video store and abashedly sneak into the porn section behind the curtain where the scant selection of LGBT films could be found? And who among us didn't watch every bad lesbian movie that came out of Hollywood, all of which either maimed or killed or mocked lesbians, or else were produced through the obvious male gaze and ended with the woman realizing the err of her ways and running back into the arms of her man?

We've had a painful film history. The movies made by us and for us were all pretty low budget and sometimes hard to watch. The sound quality and mediocre acting in many lesbian films were so bad, I'd watch with one eye; granted, one eye that was hungry for content reflective of who I was and who I loved.

That's why I bought a ticket to a screening the very first day Carol hit the big screens. I waited in a city-block-long line (something I generally avoid at all costs) to get into the theatre, standing amid the many other lesbians who likely felt the way I did. We were full of hope, not unlike how we felt the first time we saw a real lesbian on TV (or in our beds), the sense of possibility tickling the edges of us, wanting desperately to explode into cinematic magic. I even felt the anticipation rise into my throat as the lights lowered in the full theatre and the buzz of chatter quieted. Suddenly, the plethora of lesbian content that I can find on my smartphone melted away and I was right back to where I was as a budding adolescent, excited to consume something new, with all the vulnerabilities of inexperience and optimism.

To see Cate Blanchett's face light up the screen as she first appears in the corner of the busy toy section at the department store! To know that this was the beginning of something explosive that had the potential to move me to tears, to arousal, to the moon and back!

And then it didn't.

It felt like someone had taken a big sewing needle and popped all my birthday balloons. The plot was too formulaic. I could anticipate what the next scene would be. There was no buildup. And the last scene felt as though it was thrown in hastily as an afterthought in efforts to present itself as unpredictable.

Cate Blanchett and Rooney Mara, while beautiful in their own rights, didn't act their best. At points, their rapport appeared contrived and their lines seemed like the writers were trying too hard to squeeze them back into Patricia Highsmith's dusty book jacket rather than speak to the truth of the characters. We learn too much about Carol too soon. It would have been much more effective to showcase a slow unfurling of Carol's seemingly debonair and forceful presence into the much more vulnerable woman we should gradually come to know. The genius that is Cate Blanchett would have reveled in the ability to hint at, but not reveal, her familial problems until much later in the plot (much as she masterfully did in Woody Allen's Blue Jasmine.)

The film also failed to convince me that the two women were actually in love, or at least in lust with one another. Mara's character, Therese Belivet, batted her big eyes from her little frame in efforts to relay her attraction for Carol, but that too felt contrived. We're not brought along on the mating ritual journey in a way that feels authentic. Carol is clearly on the hunt and has Therese in her sightlines from the beginning, but we're not clear on whether Therese is clued in, or how she takes the leap from naive hetero to willing queer. We're also not privy to what makes the wealthy and experienced Carol so interested in the awkward retail employee to begin with.

I will shamelessly admit that, like with all mediocre lesbian films, once I realize the plot isn't going to hold me, I immediately wait for the sex scenes. At least seeing two women naked together might have some redeeming value and validate my investment of time and expense. In the film, the two women embark on a cross-country road trip so largely incredibly platonic, it leaves me believing Thelma and Louise were more lovers than these two. About 80 percent into the sequence, we finally see some action, and on the whole, it's largely disappointing.

Of course, it would be unfair not to acknowledge the Philip Glass-esque score and roomy aesthetics of the cinematography, which created a stunning venue for any film. And the idea of creating a mainstream film that is award-worthy with leading actresses and a plot ripe with potential is worthy of praise.

One could argue my expectations were too high. Why should I expect any Hollywood film to depart from the formulaic safety or profit-mindedness? And there's the need to accept that we've come an incredibly long way from the ghosts of Bound and Lost and Delirious past, and should celebrate this moment in lesbian history. Straight actors can play LGBT roles and anticipate Oscars rather than typecasting. That is progress.

But then again, isn't it time we demand excellence at every turn? We have every reason to let go of our need to cling to and uplift anything and everything that tells some aspect of our lives. True equality may one day include the luxury of critiquing a film as such, not simply because it's a gay film.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Imagine a World In Which Star Wars Never Existed

$
0
0
If the original Star Wars film had never happened, the entertainment industry would be in shambles, toys and games would be a minuscule industry, the publishing industry would in all likelihood be dead, many other industries from apparel to packaged goods would be struggling, and unemployment would be higher on a global scale.

Here's why.

George Lucas didn't just create a movie in 1977; he ushered in the modern day blockbuster era with a new, powerful playbook that all other entertainment executives and studios now follow. The original 1977 Star Wars film eventually grossed over $777 million worldwide and all of the previous six Star Wars films resulted in a total worldwide box office of just over $4 billion. But George Lucas didn't just create a film series, he created a new financial model that led to the modern day franchise. The retail value of the merchandise that Star Wars generated from the first six films is estimated to be five times its box office success, or roughly $20 billion. Until Star Wars, movies simply did not generate revenue beyond the box office, which is why 20th Century Fox allowed George Lucas to keep the rights to merchandise.

And so the 1977 Star Wars changed the calculus that goes into green-light decisions. Giving the thumbs-up these days has as much to do with the downstream entertainment and merchandise potential than it does with a movie's initial box office projection. In many cases, the theatrical release is a break-even proposition due to heavy production and marketing expenses. So a number of films, perhaps even those such as The Hobbit, Pirates of the Caribbean, and Despicable Me might have never been approved had downstream revenue sources been nonexistent. I was at a recent studio meeting where one story idea was preferred over another because the potential for merchandise was greater. That's standard today. It wasn't before 1977.

Consider even Toy Story 3; the film did about $1 billion in theaters worldwide, but its total retail take from all revenue sources was estimated to be roughly $10 billion. You gotta believe that this went into Disney's green-light decision.

This all began in 1977 with Lucas who discovered, either through brilliance or dumb luck, that an engaging imaginary world, with sympathetic characters we wish to emulate via their aspirations and possessions, and an emotionally powerful and relatable storyline, can translate into enticing toys and video games to play, emotionally fulfilling soundtracks to listen to, colorful iconography to wear, engaging books to extend the narrative, school supplies to indicate our interests, cool room accessories to reshape our environments, and even tasty food to consume. This playbook is evident in nearly every Disney film since the 1989's The Little Mermaid that ignited the Disney Renaissance, and is further evident in Harry Potter, Transformers, Avengers, Jurassic World, The Hunger Games, The Lego Movie, Guardians of the Galaxy and many more.

And so, had it not been for the 1977 Star Wars and the blockbuster playbook, the film industry would be struggling today. One study revealed that 5% of all films, most notably the blockbusters that successfully use the playbook, account for nearly all studio profits. The other 95% of films lose money or barely break-even. Said another way, most smaller films would not be made today were it not for blockbusters that fund them.

Had it not been for Star Wars, 20th Century Fox might not exist today. Due to the success of the original 1977 film, the company's stock price zoomed from a low of $6 in June 1976 to roughly $27 after the film. Revenues jumped from $195 million in 1976 to $301 million in 1977. Subsequent films in the franchise helped stabilize the studio's growth. That's quite a gift in an environment where studios have a habit of going broke or getting absorbed. (Note: Disney has the rights to the seventh film onward).

Had Star Wars and the blockbuster playbook never existed, Disney might be half its size...or less. There might have been no The Little Mermaid, no Mulan, and no The Lion King. It's hard to imagine that when Michael Eisner and Frank Wells joined The Walt Disney Company in 1984 that they did not have the Star Wars blockbuster playbook in mind. They saw a sleeping giant in Disney with great potential and a game plan created by Lucas.

Had Star Wars and the blockbuster playbook never existed, the toy industry would be a much smaller industry. Tent pole films keep the toy industry alive. Avengers.Frozen. Pirates of the Caribbean. Batman. Spider-Man and more all use the playbook. So, too, does Lego, which achieved great success through licensing movie properties like Star Wars and more recently created a highly success film of its own, The Lego Movie. Hasbro recently won the license to the Disney Princess line, all of which are derived from film properties, and combined will result in hundreds of millions of dollars into Hasbro's coffers each year.

None of which would exist without the playbook.

Had Star Wars and the playbook never existed, the publishing industry would be all but dead. For years, book publishers have been struggling to simply stay afloat. "Event films" have tossed them a lifeline of "Event Books". Even entertainment vehicles that began as books, Harry Potter for example, benefitted greatly by the movies that sold more books. The comic book end of the publishing industry greatly benefited as studios began to search for enticing stories that could be the foundation for a blockbuster franchise, which in turn would generate demand for more comic books.

Had Star Wars and the playbook never existed, the packaged goods industry and retailers would be smaller. A LIMA Study found that the global retail sales of all licensed entertainment/character-based merchandise from all sources was roughly $107 billion in 2014. With profit margins being razor thin in many businesses, a popular character on a cereal box can make the difference between success and failure.

Had Star Wars and the playbook never existed, worldwide unemployment would be higher. The percentage of company revenue that goes to labor costs averages between 10% to 30% depending on the industry. Assuming a 15% ratio, and applying that to the LIMA's study $107 billion in revenue, gives us labor expenses of $16 billion each year that are a direct result of entertainment/character-based merchandise. That equates to hundreds of thousands of jobs around the world. And this does not take into account jobs created due to other downstream revenue sources such as movie entertainment/character-based parades, musicals, theme park rides and ancillary products and services from downstream suppliers. On a worldwide basis, the 1977 Star Wars and its playbook, in the hands of so many studios today, results in millions of jobs. Had the playbook never existed, the Great Recession might have been the Great Depression II.

Yes...my numbers are rough "guesstimates", but the impact, whether you double the numbers or divide them by half is the same. The introduction of Star Wars and the blockbuster playbook, now used by all studios, has been immense. It's also possible that had George Lucas not hit on this game plan, that another creator would have stumbled upon it soon or later. But what if they did not? The world would be very different today.

And now Star Wars: The Force Awakens, is about to debut. Box office projections are staggering, and some estimate that the film might eventually bring in nearly $2 billion at the worldwide box office. But that's a tip of the franchise iceberg. The massive consumer interest, created by an equally impressive Disney marketing machine, will lead to an immense retail onslaught of toys, video games, fast food, apparel, soundtracks, publishing, and themed products in many aisles at the supermarket.

And the studio, theater owners, moviegoers, and employment statistics will be better for it. Much more so than had Star Wars never existed.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.












Director Spike Jonze Talks Kodak Nostalgia

$
0
0
2015-12-18-1450474148-2797059-10.jpg

Considering the Opening Ceremony Fall/Winter 2015 NYFW presentation was the first time that Spike Jonze saw some of his own archival 35mm photographs that inspired this season's collection, we've also been excited to hear his personal recollection of the imagery. "When I walked into the gallery where the show was, I was seeing some of those photos for the first time since I'd shot them," says Spike. "It was pretty trippy."

But what has yet to be revealed is Spike's own personal stories behind some of the images that were translated into digital prints this season. Up until now, Spike's photos have been worth a thousand of his own words. But with the recent release of Photos by Spike, his self-directed video that showcases some of the photographs that were included in the presentation and collection, Spike caught up with Opening Ceremony co-founder Humberto Leon to touch on the photographs that inspired the collection.

On the Opening Ceremony website, we provide the full interview from the video interview, where Spike and Humberto get together to talk about the first time they met, the nostalgia of Kodak boxes, and Spike's favorite photo from the show.

Read the full Q&A with the director on the Opening Ceremony website.

2015-12-18-1450474176-8469797-5.jpg

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Magic Moments Releases Debut EP And Music Video

$
0
0


Jordan ONeill who goes by the moniker Magic Moments is a singer/songwriter and producer from Los Angeles who recently released his debut audio-visual EP, Phoenix. Each song on this four-track concept album will be accompanied by a music video in which a visual story will slowly unfurl.

The first video released is "Bury The Past" which depicts three charactors adorned in festival makeup and attire, gallivanting through a verdant landscape. This video features a notable appearance from Lucent Dossier Experience's "wandering marionette," Bijoulette, a connection made and strengthened through his past work with Los Angeles-based event production collective, The Do Lab.

Magic Moments' musical style incorporates elements of indie-electronica and vocal synthpop with the aim of creating an air of positivity. On November 10th, he hosted a live vocal electronic music showcase at King King in Hollywood, performing his entire EP live along with LA artists Hopscotch and Everyman. Phoenix was mastered by R/D and ill.Gates' Twin Peak Studios and reflects themes of exuberance, self-love, healing and inspiration.

Phoenix is just the beginning of Magic Moments' musical career. The EP is a beacon for optimism, bidding farewell to the past and celebrating the present. Through these four, heartfelt songs, ONeill will grow and evolve as he improves upon his craft, especially vocally. Discovering one's voice and signature sound is an important experience for all artists and Magic Moments is on his way.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











I Am So Over 'The Male Gaze'

$
0
0
Below is a snapshot of the Top Critics section of Rotten Tomatoes for the film, Sisters. Notice anything?
2015-12-19-1450486479-1674729-Sistersreviews.jpg
(*Richard Roeper's review is not included in this graphic, but is in the statistics and highlighted below.)

Of the 30 "Top Critics" who had reviewed the movie as of the writing of this article, 11 gave the movie a negative review and 19 gave the movie a positive review.

That seems normal for an "afraid to grow up, buddy comedy," no?

Now, let's break it down by gender:
Six of the 19 positive reviews were by male critics,
13 of the 19 positive reviews were by female critics, and
(wait for it...)
ELEVEN OUT OF ELEVEN - 100% -- OF THE NEGATIVE REVIEWS WERE WRITTEN BY MEN.

Why does this matter? Because movie reviews matter in this industry. They matter to the box office results, they matter to the ancillary revenue streams, they matter to television networks deciding how often to run the a film and how much to pay for it, and they matter to the choices made in executive suites along Barham, Lankershim, Pico, Overland and Melrose Avenue. They will swear that all that matters is the money, but when looking for an excuse to dismiss a project or a talent, buyers are perfectly happy to bring up the last time someone was panned by the critics.

And the men who wrote those negative reviews, the ones in the Top Critics section of the most popular movie review website, have been doing this for a long, long time. Every one of them is among the most respected, most read writers in the field, and I am certain that not one of them thinks that his opinion of the movie has anything to do with his gender, but IT DOES!

They watch movies with a male perspective. It is not neutral simply because it has been given the majority voice for most of the existence of commerce and entertainment. They have not been expected for their whole careers (and, in fact, their whole lives) to see the universality in stories told by and about the other gender -- as women must do the majority of the time -- or even to see them as significant, or interesting, or worthy of their time.

Six of those same critics reviewed the movie, Neighbors, a comedy about a young man-child afraid of growing up going to war with a middle-aged man-child afraid he's gotten old.

Here is a side-by-side comparison of how they viewed these two very similar films (the fresh tomatoes being their reviews for Neighbors and the rotten splats being their reviews for Sisters):
2015-12-19-1450487006-5804431-Sistersvneighbors2.jpg
Can you see the difference in tone, between the gentle, loving, understanding way in which they embrace the male story and their condescending dismissiveness towards the female version of the same? Again, these men would never think themselves biased, but that is the insidious nature of implicit bias -- it creeps into statistics when no one is looking and on a grand scale, becomes irrefutable.

Eleven out of eleven negative reviews for Sisters were written by men.
Six of those same reviewers also reviewed Neighbors.
Six out of six of them gave that movie positive reviews.

I'm not saying that only women should review women's stories. To the contrary, I'm saying that men in the entertainment industry need to get out of their comfort zones and learn to see women's stories as equally valuable, equally worth seeing and telling.

The landscape for women in Hollywood, both in front of and behind the camera, is disastrous. Both the ACLU and the EEOC have opened investigations into the system-wide gender discrimination and the Department of Labor is on the verge of getting involved. It is ugly here for women who want to tell stories by women, about women or for women. Why? Because the men who decide not only what gets made, but the size of the production and marketing budgets continue to refuse to see themselves as biased, just like critics who see male stories as worth telling and female stories as less worthy of their consideration.

Two common excuses those in charge use are: 1) that women-lead movies don't make as much money; and 2) they have to consider international markets - namely China -- and women's movies don't play overseas.  

Let's dismiss the latter first. China's highest-grossing film of all time, Monster Hunt, has a strong female lead, with actress Bai Baihe getting top billing and the story containing some very fun gender twists. But let's talk about China as a market for a moment. Two-thirds of the world's female billionaires live in China. Thirty-eight percent of executive and upper management jobs are held by women (here in the good old US of A, that number is a scant 22%). There are more salary-earning, adult women in China than there are people in the United States.  

I could go on and on with the statistics of the growing wealth and spending power of women, highlighted by the fact that Porsches are available in pink there (a color not offered in any other country), but that would get repetitive. The bottom line is that the decision-makers in Hollywood are not bothering to get any real evidence beyond what they tell each other in restaurants and on golf courses, and are going to bias themselves right out of jobs when women globally start flexing our economic muscle and Hollywood is left in the dust. We are starting to see it already, and it will only get worse without a serious attitude adjustment.

The other reason they claim that female films don't get made is that they don't make as much money. This is such a spurious statistic that it would be laughable if it weren't wielded so harmfully. I wish everyone tracking rates of employment in Hollywood would please - PLEASE - stop using the information about how many of the 100 top-grossing films are directed by women. Yes, it is only 7%, but behind closed doors, that fact is turned against us, as if the movies earn less because they are made by women. If you want to honestly examine inequality in hiring and opportunity, start tracking employment of female writers and directors by budget.

How much a film grosses is in direct relation to how much is spent making and marketing it. Pitch Perfect 2, directed by Elizabeth Banks, is not in the 100 top-grossing films of all time, but it earned $287 million worldwide ON A $29 MILLION BUDGET, with a significantly smaller marketing campaign than most of its male-driven, male-directed competitors.

In fact, here are the box office results the weekend that movie opened:
2015-12-19-1450487292-1849355-boxofficepitchperfect.jpg
Three of the top five films that weekend had female leads, two of the top five had female directors, but LOOK AT THE BUDGETS! Why is it that the highest budgets go to movies made by and about men? That is the main reason male-driven movies are so much more financially successful. Give women the money and opportunities to tell stories, on par with men, and everyone will reap far greater financial rewards for it. This is only hard to figure out for the men in charge who are dead-set against figuring it out because they want to simply keep hiring people who look like them to make movies about them that they'll enjoy without having to leave the cocoon of their own viewpoints. For the survival of the industry, this has to change.

And when the movies by and about women do come out, in equal numbers and with equal budgets, hopefully the men who review them will have evolved enough to see a woman-child doing crass, gross-out comedy with her female co-star and find it funny.

If not, then it's not the women who should be out of jobs.

Valerie Alexander is an author, speaker and filmmaker. Her books on Happiness, Success and the Advancement of Women in the Workplace can be found on Amazon, and she can be reached through her website, SpeakHappiness.com, where this article originally appeared.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











A Tale of Two Stars: Jake Gyllenhaal and Dev Patel in Dubai

$
0
0
2015-12-19-1450523686-5971383-500605140.jpg


"When you look for a man, what you want to look for is a man with the heart of a poor boy and the mind of a conqueror."C. JoyBell C.

I may sound like I'm gushing when I write that meeting the wise, striking Dev Patel and listening to a talk with the handsome, funny Jake Gyllenhaal were the highlights of this year's Dubai International Film Festival for me. And make no mistake, I am. But the thought goes beyond just being in the presence of two beautiful men, beautiful both inside and out. It's about the hope such men bring to the world, to my world. To our world, just through their sheer presence in it.

Dev Patel -- Not That Slumdog Millionaire Boy Anymore!

Dev Patel is no longer that cute, geeky boy he was in Skins and his breakout film role, in Danny Boyle's Oscar-winning Slumdog Millionaire. He's all grown up now, into his wondrous talent and the perfect way to describe his larger-than-life presence is that Patel looks like he's having a good time. A great time, actually, all the time. He's thoughtful and intelligent in his interviews, but he's also game to pose for selfies with his fans on the red carpet. He's serious about arriving on time, he gets his own lunch, he doesn't play the star and he smiles. All these qualities could disqualify him from being the sex symbol that he is, yet don't. Dev Patel makes being a nice guy hot, and he's the trendiest, kindest of them all these days.

During a press conference at DIFF for his latest film The Man Who Knew Infinity in which he plays Indian mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan, Patel was candid about reconnecting to his Indian roots through Slumdog Millionaire. He admitted that, "all my early years in school I shunned my cultural heritage, and then something wonderful happened when Danny cast me in Slumdog -- I fell in love with the country, the city [Mumbai], the culture." We owe Patel's stellar career to both Boyle and Bruce Lee, an actor he looked up to in his childhood, because, Patel explained, when he would watch, "Enter the Dragon at night, I became enamored of this man's masculinity. As a child you don't understand the nuances of performance but that was the moment I knew I wanted to be on TV." When asked if he thinks Hollywood accepts diversity, or is open to it, Patel again was positive in his answer, "things are changing in Hollywood, the head of the Academy [Cheryl Boone Isaacs] is African American, and personally, I'm riding the tails of Slumdog Millionaire, a film with no stars, where the whole first half of it was subtitled -- there is definite interest in our culture."

Of course, as far as I'm concerned, cinema is a way to bridge cultures, to help us understand "the Other" and I asked Patel his thoughts. "There is no cultural divide when you sit in a dark room watching a movie," Patel replied, then continuing, "what I think filmmaking is about at its core is trying to understand what it's like to be human. You know, that's really the core of it, always." When I left the press conference I could not imagine that I'd run into Patel just a few minutes later, in the lunch room, plate in hand, getting some food, being every man. He saw me enter and came over, hand extended. "I wanted to thank you for your question," he said, explaining that he's often asked what it's like to play opposite Jeremy Irons and things like that, by other journalists. "Sometimes we can be a bit on autopilot when we talk to the press, but a question like yours makes us think." Needless to say, I could hardly think about anything or anyone else for the rest of the day.

The Man Who Knew Infinity has been picked up by IFC for North American distribution and will be hitting US screens in April of 2016.

Jake Gyllenhaal -- "Magic Comes in Risk."

I've joked around that I've been stalking Jake Gyllenhaal, both in Cannes where he and his upcoming Nocturnal Animals director Tom Ford were having lunch on the Carlton terrace across from me, and in Venice, where the actor made dying by frostbite seem like the perfect way to go, in Everest. But this time, I'd like to think he was stalking me, coming to my favorite festival DIFF, to my beloved destination Dubai to shut it down in style! A woman can have her delusions, can't she? Anyway, I wasn't the only one acting like a teenage girl in his presence. Steven Gaydos, Vice-President and Executive Editor of Variety magazine giggled, as he got his photo taken with Gyllenhaal handing him the "Variety Performer of the Year" award, and said to the audience, right before diving into his questions, that he'd "flown sixteen hours from LA just to get my picture taken with this guy!"

2015-12-19-1450523726-9562411-150117_gal_968_645_501552630.jpg


Gaydos' style had me question his questions, and I know most journalists in the audience were shifting in their seats, listening to him ask things like "how do you prepare for a role?" when what we really wanted to know was how Gyllenhaal prepared for a particular role, like the ready-for-everything, hungry-in-so-many-ways Louis Bloom in Nightcrawler. Thankfully, after a few generic questions, Gyllenhaal managed to take the bull by the horn and get his own conversation going, which inspired laughs, when he admitted "I take my guidance from hip hop, you act like your first time might be your last time, and that's from Biggie [the Notorious B.I.G.]". He then brought up his own humanity when he admitted, "I realized early on that I wasn't as smart as I thought I was and had to spend a long time preparing," for a role. He also shared memories of his childhood, with his screenwriter mom, "I remember knocking on her closed door," a few times, he said, "and probably ruining a screenplay or two..."

When we think of Gyllenhaal the actor, we can't help picture Brokeback Mountain, by Ang Lee, a filmmaker the actor admires, as he does Ken Loach and the Coen brothers, for whom he'd "work for free!" But his own taste in film runs the gamut from A Prophet, to A Separation, to Jerry Maguire and The Goonies. Perhaps a role that personally touched Gyllenhaal more than any other has been the recent Southpaw. It was during a question about playing boxer Billy "The Great" Hope that Gyllenhaal uttered my favorite quote, "magic comes in risk," and admitted that the complicated character "changed the molecular structure of me."

The best part of the talk came once Gyllenhaal began taking questions from the audience. While it appears most of his more cooky fans are from Australia -- one tried to get up on stage to get a picture taken with him simply because, she admitted, she loved him "soooo much!" -- the actor showed his sense of humor and his unassuming style when dealing with his admirers. And even those few pesky journalists sprinkled among the fans who wanted to know about his future plans. He described his upcoming Demolition, co-starring Naomi Watts and directed by Jean-Marc Vallée as a man "who takes apart his life and reassembles his life at the same time." He also sees it as, "a metaphor for awakening to who we actually are," as human beings.

But the giggle-until-you-cry moment came almost at the end of the chat, when a man stood up and admitted that his best friend was really in love with Gyllenhaal, and could he say "I love you" to his friend, so he could record it? "What's your friend's name?" Asked the actor. We all heard "Daniel" I promise. "Daniel? Your friend's name is Daniel???" Gyllenhaal exclaimed quite amused. "No it's Tanya, Tanya is my friend's name." Replied the man in the audience. The actor waited a moment, perfect comic timing, and said, quite deadpan, "I love you... Tanya?" I still laugh, even as I type this.

And the biggest myth about Hollywood, according to Gyllenhaal? "That everybody is really short, and that's a stereotype I don't appreciate," he said tongue-in-cheek, then continued, "the really talented ones are, I'm not."



Demolition is scheduled for release in April 2016.

All images courtesy of the Dubai International Film Festival, used with permission.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Truth About Malcolm Gladwell?

$
0
0
This week the best-selling author was outed by the New York Times as a "blurb whore." The Times didn't actually label him that, but it's the term publishing insiders use for an author whose name appears promiscuously on book jackets.

The Times revealed how often Gladwell blurbs books totally outside his own areas of expertise. His name "adorns scores of book covers not his own" and if blurbing were an Olympic sport, he'd clearly get the gold.

"It's hard to compete with Malcolm Gladwell," said A.J. Jacobs, the author of four books, including The Year of Living Biblically, who was once such a prolific blurbist, his publisher demanded he stop writing them. "He is always going to get the front cover. I get the back cover or, maybe, inside."


Gladwell's blurb helped make Freakonomics a best seller and publishers hope for similar success for their books when they enlist the nation's Blurber-in-Chief.

2015-12-19-1450495505-2534440-malcolmgladwell.jpg


The Times reports that Gladwell hands blurbs out like Santa, though he doesn't seem to care if authors are naughty or nice. No matter what the book's genre, it does seem to help, though, if there's a personal connection: "Many of the people for whom Mr. Gladwell has written blurbs he knows socially or has even dated."

But the personal apparently goes deeper than that.

When Jacobs wrote about his "blurbing problem" a few years ago in the Times,he said Gladwell told him that tweeting and blurbing were "conceptually identical: the short, targeted judgment in which the initiator draws attention to himself while seeming to draw attention to something else."

Blurbing is clearly an ego-boost and good publicity for authors writing blurbs, no matter how famous they are. Jacobs confessed as much in that article: "I get a thrill from seeing my name scattered throughout the bookstore."

His tone was less serious than Gladwell's, but the story sounds very much the same: "Me! Me! Me!"

Lev Raphael's books--from mystery to memoir--can be found on Amazon.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Viewing all 38214 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>